2016-07-30 20:38 GMT+08:00 Marc Feeley dr.marc.feeley@gmail.com:
The first order of business is choosing which version(s) of Gambit to branch from. It could be more than one version if various groups or individuals have different requirements. I foresee that the maintenance of these branches will be driven by these groups, so there is no reason to place a limit of 1. However, for the sake of focus, we should probably not maintain more than 2 or 3 “stable” branches in the long run and I think we should start with one branch to see how it goes.
Yes!
So lets first determine which branch to start from… v4.7.0 or v4.7.2 or
other?
Also how should we name the branches… I propose “v4.7.0-stable”
If you have a particular motivation for 4.7.0 then go with it.
I guess people suggested 4.7.2 simply because it was slightly newer, I would guess it has some new features.
Though perhaps 4.7.0 is a milestone so sure then go with it.
James, Mattias, Brad, anyone else, any thoughts?
I guess spend no more time than until Thu or Fri to wait for this, the difference is insignificantly small.
Afficher les réponses par date
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:27:05PM +0800, Adam wrote:
2016-07-30 20:38 GMT+08:00 Marc Feeley dr.marc.feeley@gmail.com:
The first order of business is choosing which version(s) of Gambit to branch from. It could be more than one version if various groups or individuals have different requirements. I foresee that the maintenance of these branches will be driven by these groups, so there is no reason to place a limit of 1. However, for the sake of focus, we should probably not maintain more than 2 or 3 “stable” branches in the long run and I think we should start with one branch to see how it goes.
Yes!
So lets first determine which branch to start from… v4.7.0 or v4.7.2 or
other?
Also how should we name the branches… I propose “v4.7.0-stable”
If you have a particular motivation for 4.7.0 then go with it.
I guess people suggested 4.7.2 simply because it was slightly newer, I would guess it has some new features.
Though perhaps 4.7.0 is a milestone so sure then go with it.
James, Mattias, Brad, anyone else, any thoughts?
I guess spend no more time than until Thu or Fri to wait for this, the difference is insignificantly small.
I have little to say, because I'm not a regular Gambt user, but if it were up to me, I'd pick the newest one that is adequately debugged.
-- hendrik
Gambit-list mailing list Gambit-list@iro.umontreal.ca https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list