Hi,
I am learning Scheme on my own by exploring gambit by personal needs. Therefore there is a huge lack of experience on my side.
Prior to my current project I felt in love with Test Driven Development. Scheme enabled me to improve my workflow by programming interactive - sufficiating my own requirements. The downside is that I am unable to include unit test into my current workflow. Any advice would be appreciated.
In order to cover my current project in retrospective, I want to create tests (note that the usability of the provided test suite requires heavy exploration >:-) ). In both cases - testing afterwards or prior to implementing functionality - I am relying on branch coverage heavily. Since I am covering R5RS only, I am wondering if there is a test suite which can provide me with branch coverage (regardless of output formats/IDE's).
I am aware about the following two facts: - In order to programming test-driven, a IDE suggestion implementations is required (not required) - the functional programming paradigm should enable me to cover my code by determine the permutations of arguments. I want to support this with branch coverage, so that I suspend my current workflow and resume afterwards.
I am happy about sincerely feedback.
Thomas
Afficher les réponses par date
On 5/2/22 4:57 PM, Thomas Hage wrote:
Hi,
I am learning Scheme on my own by exploring gambit by personal needs. Therefore there is a huge lack of experience on my side.
Prior to my current project I felt in love with Test Driven Development. Scheme enabled me to improve my workflow by programming interactive - sufficiating my own requirements. The downside is that I am unable to include unit test into my current workflow. Any advice would be appreciated.
In order to cover my current project in retrospective, I want to create tests (note that the usability of the provided test suite requires heavy exploration >:-) ). In both cases - testing afterwards or prior to implementing functionality - I am relying on branch coverage heavily. Since I am covering R5RS only, I am wondering if there is a test suite which can provide me with branch coverage (regardless of output formats/IDE's).
I am aware about the following two facts:
- In order to programming test-driven, a IDE suggestion implementations
is required (not required)
- the functional programming paradigm should enable me to cover my code
by determine the permutations of arguments. I want to support this with branch coverage, so that I suspend my current workflow and resume afterwards.
I don't know precisely what you're looking for, but here is a bit of what I know about test coverage (not "branch coverage").
One can configure Gambit with "--enable-coverage", which, if compiling with the GCC C compiler, enables both "-ftest-coverage" and "-fprofile-arcs".
Unfortunately, recent versions of GCC incorporate an optimization pass at the "-O1" optimization level that cannot handle code with large switch statements or computed goto's, that should be disabled when using test coverage, see
https://github.com/gambit/gambit/issues/671
So one could use
./configure CC='gcc -fno-tree-loop-im' --enable-test-coverage
This will report which lines in the generated .c files are executed, rather than which lines in the original .scm files are executed. This is inconvenient unless you know how to read Gambit's machine-generated C code; to track which lines in the .scm files are executed, configure with
./configure CC='gcc -fno-tree-loop-im' --enable-test-coverage --track-scheme
Scheme code that uses macros to simplify generating several copies of repetitive code (e.g., the way Gambit's runtime has a large macro to generate code for operations on vectors, then u8vectors, then strings, then ...) will not give you good information on test coverage with --track-scheme. If you want to know which parts of highly macrofied code are truly executed, then you'll need to avoid --track-scheme and just examine the coverage statistics for the .c files---which means you'll need to keep the .c files, with the -keep-temp option to the Gambit compiler, e.g.,
gsc -exe -keep-temp test.scm ./test
will keep the test.c around, which will be needed when running gcov on the generated coverage statistics files.
This is all from a Linux/MacOS perspective, so I don't know whether it will help you.
Brad Lucier
Thomas,
The attached file shows a light weight, self contained, compile-time unit-test framework that I made. It allows tests to be collocated in the source with the associated functions under test, rather than spread over the file system in other files. If any of the unit tests fail at compile time, you get no object files/c files/exe, which I've not seen elsewhere. Closest thing I've seen that's comparable is Python's doctests, but mine is better, because I wrote it :-)
The file attached is one that I adapted from the following work that I did years ago: https://billsix.github.io/bug.html https://github.com/billsix/bug
Hope it helps,
Bill
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 5:38 PM Thomas Hage thomas.hage@live.de wrote:
Hi,
I am learning Scheme on my own by exploring gambit by personal needs. Therefore there is a huge lack of experience on my side.
Prior to my current project I felt in love with Test Driven Development. Scheme enabled me to improve my workflow by programming interactive - sufficiating my own requirements. The downside is that I am unable to include unit test into my current workflow. Any advice would be appreciated.
In order to cover my current project in retrospective, I want to create tests (note that the usability of the provided test suite requires heavy exploration >:-) ). In both cases - testing afterwards or prior to implementing functionality - I am relying on branch coverage heavily. Since I am covering R5RS only, I am wondering if there is a test suite which can provide me with branch coverage (regardless of output formats/IDE's).
I am aware about the following two facts:
- In order to programming test-driven, a IDE suggestion
implementations is required (not required)
- the functional programming paradigm should enable me to cover
my code by determine the permutations of arguments. I want to support this with branch coverage, so that I suspend my current workflow and resume afterwards.
I am happy about sincerely feedback.
Thomas
Gambit-list mailing list Gambit-list@iro.umontreal.ca https://mailman.iro.umontreal.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list