Marc:
You're listed a participant in a panel discussion of the "Future of Scheme" at the Scheme 2017 workshop at ICFP 2017.
Did you make it? Any comments on the "Future of Scheme"? (Or from anyone else who'd like to comment.)
Brad
Afficher les réponses par date
Marc could not attend due to a health issue, so Nada had me in the panel instead.
While there were worries, notably due to the recent weaning of the Scheme Workshop, reduction in the number of active implementations, etc., I was happy that a lot of schemers (or "racketeers") were presenting at the main ICFP conference, and that all of R7RS, Racket and Gerbil seemed to be converging on a model of a big higher-level scheme with modules on top of a small lower-level scheme.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org On ne peut pas être maître de répartir la richesse sans s'être fait préalablement maître de la richesse ; la répartition c'est donc tout d'abord le monopole — Anselme Bellegarrigue
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Bradley Lucier lucier@math.purdue.edu wrote:
Marc:
You're listed a participant in a panel discussion of the "Future of Scheme" at the Scheme 2017 workshop at ICFP 2017.
Did you make it? Any comments on the "Future of Scheme"? (Or from anyone else who'd like to comment.)
Brad _______________________________________________ Gambit-list mailing list Gambit-list@iro.umontreal.ca https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list