I have a student, Julie Kienzle, working this summer on the evolution of Gambit’s performance over the history of the commits. The graphs produced by her work up to now are here:
http://gambitscheme.org/~kienzle/charts/web/graphics-web.html
There are graphs giving the geometric mean of all benchmarks in various settings (32/64 bit single/multiple hosts, with safe/unsafe declarations, etc), and also graphs for individual benchmarks.
Comments are welcome.
Marc
Afficher les réponses par date
Nice, it will be very interesting to look through the graphs.
Some feedback about the website from a user perspective:
Currently it's difficult to look through the graphs and use the website because the site loads really slow (scrolling is also very slow). I have no experience with web developing but perhaps it would be better to use static html instead of js and split the graphs into one category per site. Some other points:
- The site "breaks" the back-button of the browser (from a ui perspective). Wwhen clicking a graph with the left mouse button you cannot go back with the browsers back button.
- It's not possible to open the graphs in a seperate browser tab.
- When you click on a graph which is quite at the bottom of the site and go back with the onclick-button you are back at the top of the site, combined with the slow scrolling and loading this makes the site inconvenient to use.
Marc Feeley feeley@iro.umontreal.ca writes:
I have a student, Julie Kienzle, working this summer on the evolution of Gambit’s performance over the history of the commits. The graphs produced by her work up to now are here:
http://gambitscheme.org/~kienzle/charts/web/graphics-web.html
There are graphs giving the geometric mean of all benchmarks in various settings (32/64 bit single/multiple hosts, with safe/unsafe declarations, etc), and also graphs for individual benchmarks.
Comments are welcome.
Marc
Gambit-list mailing list Gambit-list@iro.umontreal.ca https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list
But seeing the commits on the graph is really nice.
Atticus atticus0@posteo.org writes:
Nice, it will be very interesting to look through the graphs.
Some feedback about the website from a user perspective:
Currently it's difficult to look through the graphs and use the website because the site loads really slow (scrolling is also very slow). I have no experience with web developing but perhaps it would be better to use static html instead of js and split the graphs into one category per site. Some other points:
The site "breaks" the back-button of the browser (from a ui perspective). Wwhen clicking a graph with the left mouse button you cannot go back with the browsers back button.
It's not possible to open the graphs in a seperate browser tab.
When you click on a graph which is quite at the bottom of the site and
go back with the onclick-button you are back at the top of the site, combined with the slow scrolling and loading this makes the site inconvenient to use.
Marc Feeley feeley@iro.umontreal.ca writes:
I have a student, Julie Kienzle, working this summer on the evolution of Gambit’s performance over the history of the commits. The graphs produced by her work up to now are here:
http://gambitscheme.org/~kienzle/charts/web/graphics-web.html
There are graphs giving the geometric mean of all benchmarks in various settings (32/64 bit single/multiple hosts, with safe/unsafe declarations, etc), and also graphs for individual benchmarks.
Comments are welcome.
Marc
Gambit-list mailing list Gambit-list@iro.umontreal.ca https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list
Gambit-list mailing list Gambit-list@iro.umontreal.ca https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list
On Jun 19, 2015, at 6:59 AM, Marc Feeley feeley@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
I have a student, Julie Kienzle, working this summer on the evolution of Gambit’s performance over the history of the commits. The graphs produced by her work up to now are here:
http://gambitscheme.org/~kienzle/charts/web/graphics-web.html
There are graphs giving the geometric mean of all benchmarks in various settings (32/64 bit single/multiple hosts, with safe/unsafe declarations, etc), and also graphs for individual benchmarks.
Comments are welcome.
I think there’s too much emphasis on performance and not enough on capabilities (libraries, macros, building communities, …).
And yes, I know that I’m a prime contributor to the emphasis on performance, and the emphasis on performance, correctness, and completeness (at least of R[45]RS) is what drew me to Gambit in the first place.
I don’t know how to encourage those other things.
Brad