Bug 106 is marked as fixed in bugziilla, but I still get the same error when compiling against Gambit 4.6.0. Also, adding the macros to the gambit.h file by hand fixes the problem:
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106
Also, it looks to me like the latest gambit.h.in in the git repository doesn't have the macros defined either.
repleffect
Afficher les réponses par date
Oh, duh. It's *not* marked as fix.
My mistake. Ignore me.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, REPLeffect repleffect@gmail.com wrote:
Bug 106 is marked as fixed in bugziilla, but I still get the same error when compiling against Gambit 4.6.0. Also, adding the macros to the gambit.h file by hand fixes the problem:
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106
Also, it looks to me like the latest gambit.h.in in the git repository doesn't have the macros defined either.
repleffect
not marked as *fixed* (not "fix") -- not my day today, it seems :-D
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:41 PM, REPLeffect repleffect@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, duh. It's *not* marked as fix.
My mistake. Ignore me.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, REPLeffect repleffect@gmail.com wrote:
Bug 106 is marked as fixed in bugziilla, but I still get the same error when compiling against Gambit 4.6.0. Also, adding the macros to the gambit.h file by hand fixes the problem:
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106
Also, it looks to me like the latest gambit.h.in in the git repository doesn't have the macros defined either.
repleffect
-
REPLeffect