He doesn't give the programs he wrote, and doesn't say whether his "new version of Scheme" is Gambit, but the entire post is interesting.
Brad
Afficher les réponses par date
If he liked gambit before, chances are that he is referencing gambit with the phrase "new Scheme implementation". I would love to see his code, but as you said he does not give us the source.
Thanks for sharing this article. It's really interesting.
Pavel
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Bradley Lucier lucier@math.purdue.edu wrote:
He doesn't give the programs he wrote, and doesn't say whether his "new version of Scheme" is Gambit, but the entire post is interesting.
Brad
http://bit-player.org/2009/long-division _______________________________________________ Gambit-list mailing list Gambit-list@iro.umontreal.ca https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list
2009/2/12 Pavel Dudrenov dudrenov@gmail.com:
If he liked gambit before, chances are that he is referencing gambit with the phrase "new Scheme implementation". I would love to see his code, but as you said he does not give us the source.
Thanks for sharing this article. It's really interesting.
Pavel
Didn't he say that he rewrote the entire thing in Common Lisp?
Oisín
On Feb 12, 2009, at 9:28 PM, Oisín Mac Fhearaí wrote:
2009/2/12 Pavel Dudrenov dudrenov@gmail.com:
If he liked gambit before, chances are that he is referencing gambit with the phrase "new Scheme implementation". I would love to see his code, but as you said he does not give us the source.
Thanks for sharing this article. It's really interesting.
Pavel
Didn't he say that he rewrote the entire thing in Common Lisp?
Eventually, yes. But from TFA:
After an hour of fiddling and tweaking, I got it running on new hardware with a new operating system and a new Scheme implementation. I was able to regenerate the same maps I produced nine years ago, using the same data as input.
Brad