One other thing that can be added to Gambit-C to help automatic builders is a '-v' parameter that prints the name and version of the compiler (without colors or anything, so it is easily parseable).
Afficher les réponses par date
Is a -v option really needed? You can always do:
% gsi -e "(pretty-print (system-version))" 40065 % gsi -e "(pretty-print (system-version-string))" "4.0 beta 15"
Marc
On 6-Oct-05, at 7:59 PM, Pupeno wrote:
One other thing that can be added to Gambit-C to help automatic builders is a '-v' parameter that prints the name and version of the compiler (without colors or anything, so it is easily parseable). -- Pupeno pupeno@pupeno.com (http://pupeno.com) _______________________________________________ Gambit-list mailing list Gambit-list@iro.umontreal.ca http://mailman.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list
On Friday 07 October 2005 10:44, you wrote:
Is a -v option really needed? You can always do:
No, it is not really needed, but it would be usefull. Most unix programs reply the versions when running with -v and then exit. That is very usefull when trying to find a program, because -v is not likely to cause any harm.
% gsi -e "(pretty-print (system-version))" 40065 % gsi -e "(pretty-print (system-version-string))" "4.0 beta 15"
I am not interested on gsi, gsc is the program that has a conflicting name with another very widely used and installed tool. gsc is the one that gets renamed on packages to avoid conflict. So, I should start running a set of programs with -i -e "(pretty-print (system-version-string))" until one responds. I'll preffer to just use -v.
Thank you.
-
Marc Feeley -
Pupeno