3 Oct
2008
3 Oct
'08
15:03
"MF" == Marc Feeley feeley@iro.umontreal.ca writes:
MF> I've thought about implementing a "tree-shaker" solution which MF> would be closer to what you want. It would require that the MF> whole runtime be compiled with your program. This would not MF> only allow the compiler to eliminate dead code, it would MF> eliminate the need for intermodule jumps and thus improve MF> performance.
I'll put my vote in for this one right now. I was just thinking of how I could do this with one of my applications earlier today.
Joel
--
Joel J. Adamson
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
CB #3280, Coker Hall
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280
Before you reply to this email, please read
http://www.unc.edu/~adamsonj/email-howto.html