2009/6/16 James Long longster@gmail.com:
I wouldn't want this. It's common in Gambit for LOAD to be ambiguous,
I meant to write a question, but forgot the mark. That's also why I added the static analysis part (as in "if you don't know, don't do it").
*Yet*, even thoung linking too early may be bad, *compiling* ahead might not (but then, I don't remember/know whether state involved during macro expansion "survives" at run time and can be used when loading another file with macros).
If Gambit ever adopts a module system, we may have enough information to rationalize about the modules, and this may be possible.
I should fork a new thread for that, but besides its newness [1] and the complete lack of documentation on the wiki, are there any drawbacks to blackhole?
P!
[1] That's a nice word I've never heard or used before today. Not quite like "novelty", right?