30 Avr
2007
30 Avr
'07
11:10
Adrien Pierard wrote:
I was last week wondering about something really close to thise question : Is it possible to write a macro that expands to nothing ? (ideally, a portable way to do it)
I think the best way is to return '(begin) from the macro (that's what I do and also many other people; other solutions include #!void (syntax not portable), #f (but doesn't hint as well at bugs, or similar values).
Christian.