5 Fév
2008
5 Fév
'08
15:54
Thanks Christian - I haven't fiddled with the c-interface for a while, and that's surely the way to do it.
On Feb 5, 2008 5:31 AM, Christian Jaeger christian@pflanze.mine.nu wrote:
PS. I shouldn't have used the "NUM" identifyer for the scheme-to-c part of c-define-type; to avoid confusion, apply the attached patch. Now once you try to use the type in a c-lambda return position, you should get a more meaningful error message.
--
James Long
Coptix, Inc.
longster@gmail.com