31 Oct
2013
31 Oct
'13
11:08
On Oct 31, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Bradley Lucier lucier@math.purdue.edu wrote:
- in case the C libm sinh, etc have poor precision, the use of the above portable definitions in the definition of complex asin and acos gives no worse precision than the current implementation in Gambit.
I'm sorry, I don't understand this sentence.
In your (future) implementation of complex asin and acos which is based on flsinh, etc, I am asking if the precision of complex asin and acos will be no worse than what it is currently if flsinh, etc are defined using the portable naive implementation.
Marc