Hi Per,
First question I have is :
Can you elaborate on why you decided to model black hole on syntax-rules vs other approaches like R6RS syntax-case for instance. My knowledge of those approaches is very light but it seems that if R6RS decided to scrap syntax-rules and go for another approach there must be good reasons. Can you comment on that? It would help a lot in getting an idea of the strengths and weaknesses of black hole.
Also, I read that syntax-rules doesn't support any kind of non-hygienic macros. Is that the case for black hole or did you extend it to support non-hygienic macros?
Thanks,
Guillaume
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Per Eckerdalper.eckerdal@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. The documentation that's supposed to be there is not yet finished, so I'm afraid the best documentation of Black Hole that's available at the moment is the tutorial at http://mwaza.dyndns.org/apps/files/bh-tutorial.html
Feel free to ask questions, that will help me to write more relevant documentation; I think it's difficult to document Black Hole, because I don't really know what's obvious and not, or where the best place to start explaining is.
/Per
11 jul 2009 kl. 15.24 skrev Guillaume Cartier:
Are the documentation links for black hole broken? They always ask me to upload a file.
http://dynamo.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/wiki/index.php/Black_Hole _______________________________________________ Gambit-list mailing list Gambit-list@iro.umontreal.ca https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list