Thanks allot Per,
Maybe you want publish this info to the your git's readme?
Then what the Spork state is? I mean. Is it abandoned?
On 8/3/10 10:36 PM, Per Eckerdal wrote:
> Well... I'd say that the Sack specification is rather complete. It is more or less a Schemification of Ruby's Rack, which must be considered both complete and stable. The specification is not finished, and if it would be
>
> ...
>
> I do not have time to maintain it myself, but I will gladly accept patches and API improvements (but talk to me first to make sure that it goes in line with the rest of Sack). I'd love if anyone was interested to maintain it and move it forward, but I don't really expect that to happen. I put all my time I have on Gambit related things on Black Hole.
>
> /Per
>