On 2010-06-11, at 12:04 PM, chevalma@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
So I'm not quite sure what to do with this issue. We can bring it up for a vote among us after some more discussion. For the time being each one should just use the notation that they are most comfortable with. We'll refactor if need be. At this point what is important is that we advance the implementation... i.e. code!
Erick and I would like to propose that perhaps you should let us two take the final decisions as to the coding conventions and source code organizagion. Simply because those things are subjective, and we will be the ones who end up spending the most time working with this codebase.
I do plan to contribute to the source code base in non-trivial ways. In fact at this point I've written over 6000 lines of JavaScript for the project (which is about 95% of all the code we have!). But as I say, just go ahead and code in CamelCase if that is what you are comfortable with. To me it is not a major issue as it does not affect the quality of the end-product. I'm more interested in coding style issues that affect performance (not limited to speed of execution).
Marc