31 Jan
2011
31 Jan
'11
09:01
On 2011-01-30, at 4:54 PM, chevalma@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
I'm guessing a different call instruction implementation (with support in the backend) that doesn't push a new stack frame.
That seems doable, given that the parameters are part of the instruction (the parameters are the initial content of the activation frame of the called function). However, the return address parameter will have to be an explicit operand, pretty much like the "cont" annotation on calls.
Marc