9 Mai
2011
9 Mai
'11
09:49
On 2011-05-08, at 4:01 PM, chevalma@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
I suggest we discuss this in person tomorrow.
I don't think that is the best use of our time. First of all we should include Erick in any discussion which touches on the back-end and his master's thesis. Second, we don't need more informal discussion on the subject. If you want to pursue the idea of IR code-patching you have to come up with arguments that are backed up with some analysis, evidence and measurements. For example, you could present this at one of the group meetings. I want to avoid using speculative arguments in the design of the system.
Marc