[gambit-list] Parameter objects performance Q

Adam adam.mlmb at gmail.com
Thu Mar 12 02:46:31 EDT 2020

Fare if you want to discuss this please start a separate thread, maybe
offer some pseudocode to illustrate utility :)

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 14:32, Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't know that anyone is interested in implementing it, but I would
> be grateful if Gambit implemented delimited control, with continuation
> marks and delimited parameter bindings. Then, the value of a parameter
> potentially depends not just on "the" continuation, but on the list of
> currently active continuation frames, which can grow and shrink
> non-monotonically due to delimited control operators.
> http://okmij.org/ftp/Computation/dynamic-binding.html
> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics•
> http://fare.tunes.org
> We could have an obfuscated-scheme contest, but if call/cc and macros are
> allowed, that would be like using nuclear bombs to hunt bunnyrabbits...
>         — Ray Dillinger
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.iro.umontreal.ca/pipermail/gambit-list/attachments/20200312/f95c4d9c/attachment.htm>

More information about the Gambit-list mailing list