[gambit-list] Anyone else working in a schemey wrapper for c structs/unions/types?

Estevo euccastro at gmail.com
Wed Dec 25 08:45:50 EST 2013

I think how wills work is fine.  It's the particular usage of wills I
described before that I find dangerous.  The problem with Gambit is that it
doesn't offer a better way to do that.

As I said, I'm working on a patch that enables a better way.  As soon as I
have a coherent proposal I'll ask the list for

On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Mikael <mikael.rcv at gmail.com> wrote:

> Right. Just to clarify: Right now, do you see a problem about what's
> happening or do you consider all spinning fine?
> 2013/12/25 Estevo <euccastro at gmail.com>
>> > [...] But since none of these references is strong, the will that has
>> it as testator
>> > will be made executable in the next garbage collection[1].
>> (Sorry, by "the next" garbage collection I don't mean a different one,
>> just the same one I trigger by calling (##gc).)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.iro.umontreal.ca/pipermail/gambit-list/attachments/20131225/ec79f2f0/attachment.htm>

More information about the Gambit-list mailing list