[gambit-list] Anyone else working in a schemey wrapper for c structs/unions/types?

Estevo euccastro at gmail.com
Wed Dec 25 10:03:38 EST 2013

This is what I came up with.


An usage example is included in the comments.

For rationale and background see my (withdrawn) previous shot at this:


Comments welcome!

On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Estevo <euccastro at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think how wills work is fine.  It's the particular usage of wills I
> described before that I find dangerous.  The problem with Gambit is that it
> doesn't offer a better way to do that.
> As I said, I'm working on a patch that enables a better way.  As soon as I
> have a coherent proposal I'll ask the list for
> opinions/alternatives/suggestions.
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Mikael <mikael.rcv at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Right. Just to clarify: Right now, do you see a problem about what's
>> happening or do you consider all spinning fine?
>> 2013/12/25 Estevo <euccastro at gmail.com>
>>> > [...] But since none of these references is strong, the will that has
>>> it as testator
>>> > will be made executable in the next garbage collection[1].
>>> (Sorry, by "the next" garbage collection I don't mean a different one,
>>> just the same one I trigger by calling (##gc).)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.iro.umontreal.ca/pipermail/gambit-list/attachments/20131225/d0d40414/attachment.htm>

More information about the Gambit-list mailing list