[gambit-list] A simple blackhole test
mikael.rcv at gmail.com
Wed Jun 8 09:33:32 EDT 2011
2011/6/8 Mikael <mikael.rcv at gmail.com>
> 2011/6/8 Per Eckerdal
> Hehe.. The stuff you have been experiencing is a large reason to why I have
>> pretty much given up working on Black Hole, it is so hard to integrate it
>> into Gambit in a reasonable way.
>> It kindof works for me personally, for instance because I know that the
>> warning messages you see are from Gambit and not BH, but there are so many
>> small things that don't make sense unless you know the inner workings of BH
>> (debugging from the REPL and attempting to access the hygienically renamed
>> variables is a mess), and I haven't been able to get around it.
> While indeed Black Hole doesn't 'swallow' Gambit and abstract it away
> completely, it is a good module system that delivers for practical use.
> Re REPL debugging, the only limit I see is that the granularity of the code
> row&column numbering is decreased to the level of individual top-level
> procedure only.
^ Aha this one is fixed in the syntactictower branch.
> Accessing the variables in their renamed form is fine also, as you have
> the names of all local variables from ,be all the time.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gambit-list