[gambit-list] (c-define-type array-int "std::vector<int>")
Marc Feeley
feeley at iro.umontreal.ca
Fri May 5 17:54:33 EDT 2006
On 5-May-06, at 11:40 PM, Stephane Le Cornec wrote:
> Gambit does not tolerate :: or <> in this form. Is there any reason
> why this wouldn't work, other than Gambit accepting the string?
>
No reason other than my lazyness. C++ names are a pain to parse. As
a workaround use:
(c-declare "#define std_vector_int std::vector<int>")
(c-define-type array-int "std_vector_int")
> I could typedef std::vector<int> into std_vector_int for that, but
> I lose genericity. The goal here is to use macro to generate
> interface to native C struct and handle arrays of structs. I seems
> much nicer to use lambda than to define
> the 8 conversion defines.
>
> Has anyone used in Gambit native C calls that accept/fill struct
> arrays?
> How did you decide to handle this and why did you come to that
> conclusion?
I'm not sure what you mean.
Marc
More information about the Gambit-list
mailing list