8 Mai
2005
8 Mai
'05
15:43
Marc: Here are the diffs for _num.scm after I used the overflow tests from Hacker's Delight. There should be fewer jumps in ##+ and ##-, and fewer unnecessary calls to ##bignum.*. For example, with the old code we have 617203464 bytes allocated and 768376664 bytes allocated when using binary splitting applied to some series to compute e and pi to 10,000 digits, but with the new code we have 612389032 bytes allocated and 764550248 bytes allocated Not a big difference, but it may help more for other codes. Brad