[gambit-list] Some floating-point benchmarks

Bradley Lucier lucier at math.purdue.edu
Wed Apr 18 20:11:31 EDT 2018

> On Apr 18, 2018, at 7:02 PM, Marc Feeley <feeley at iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> I see that the r7rs-benchmarks do the same, which is unfortunate because they will measure code with lots of uninteresting boxing/unboxing.  I think lots of Scheme implementations support f64vectors nowadays.

It doesn’t appear that R7RS-small has homogeneous vectors (except for bytevectors).


More information about the Gambit-list mailing list