[gambit-list] Parameter object allocation/get/set worstcase?

Adam adam.mlmb at gmail.com
Mon Jan 4 00:48:46 EST 2016


Hi Marc,

A long time ago you mentioned here that "parameter objects don't scale".

I guess by that you meant that there are at least theoretically possible
worstcase situations for their allocation, get or set operations or
otherwise, that are far beyond say 1000 CPU cycles per object or operation.

Would you mind explaning how bad the worstcase is, just to be able to
understand what they're good for practically and what not?

Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.iro.umontreal.ca/pipermail/gambit-list/attachments/20160104/65b81886/attachment.htm>


More information about the Gambit-list mailing list