[gambit-list] 4.6.6 or 4.2.8
mikael.rcv at gmail.com
Fri Jun 8 05:50:40 EDT 2012
I remember an ML post where Marc said that, presuming you don't use eval,
Gambit's Scheme codebase can be tree-shaked too.
Well just removing unneeded parts of Gambit's core ought to be
straightforward enough too; afaik actually *all* of the runtime can be
removed and you still have a running system, though I suppose such a system
would be of little use.
2012/6/8 Alex Queiroz <asandroq at gmail.com>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Steve Graham <jsgrahamus at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > So, they both execute, but the tree shaking didn't seem to do much.
> > Any thoughts?
> The tree shaker seems to work during compilation, not linking. It
> doesn't avoid bringing all of Gambit-C into your executable.
> Gambit-list mailing list
> Gambit-list at iro.umontreal.ca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gambit-list