[gambit-list] 4.6.6 or 4.2.8

Mikael mikael.rcv at gmail.com
Fri Jun 8 05:50:40 EDT 2012


I remember an ML post where Marc said that, presuming you don't use eval,
Gambit's Scheme codebase can be tree-shaked too.

Well just removing unneeded parts of Gambit's core ought to be
straightforward enough too; afaik actually *all* of the runtime can be
removed and you still have a running system, though I suppose such a system
would be of little use.

2012/6/8 Alex Queiroz <asandroq at gmail.com>

> Hallo,
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Steve Graham <jsgrahamus at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So, they both execute, but the tree shaking didn't seem to do much.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
>
> The tree shaker seems to work during compilation, not linking. It
> doesn't avoid bringing all of Gambit-C into your executable.
>
> --
> -alex
> http://www.artisancoder.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Gambit-list mailing list
> Gambit-list at iro.umontreal.ca
> https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/pipermail/gambit-list/attachments/20120608/9d851b38/attachment.html 


More information about the Gambit-list mailing list