[gambit-list] Problem in thread-sleep! may be a poor implementation of the select system call
vasil.s.d at gmail.com
Wed Jan 28 14:39:22 EST 2009
Interpreted code shows average n about 9064 (peak value was 9193),
compiled code - 9210 (peak value was 9226).
Code was compiled with "(declare (not safe))" to get more speed.
Without this declaration difference between interpreted and compiled
code is much less, ~9064 and ~9143 in average, accordingly.
> On 28-Jan-09, at 2:03 PM, vasil wrote:
>> After update scheme code displays n from 9040 to 9192.
> Great! The discrepancy with the ideal result of 10000 is due to the
> interpretation overhead for the code executed between successive calls
> to thread-sleep! (you will probably get slightly higher numbers if you
> compile the code). So the resolution is much improved.
More information about the Gambit-list