[gambit-list] Problem in thread-sleep! may be a poor implementation of the select system call
Marc Feeley
feeley at iro.umontreal.ca
Wed Jan 28 14:24:54 EST 2009
On 28-Jan-09, at 2:03 PM, vasil wrote:
> After update scheme code displays n from 9040 to 9192.
Great! The discrepancy with the ideal result of 10000 is due to the
interpretation overhead for the code executed between successive calls
to thread-sleep! (you will probably get slightly higher numbers if you
compile the code). So the resolution is much improved.
Marc
More information about the Gambit-list
mailing list