[gambit-list] srfi-13/14
ben at fuhok.net
ben at fuhok.net
Thu May 12 19:45:43 EDT 2005
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:47:12PM -0500, Bradley Lucier wrote:
> I think our ultimate goal should be to add enough explicit checks
> that the libraries can be compiled with all unsafe optimizations on.
Which includes '(declare (not safe)) right?
Earlier today, I realized that either these checks aren't working
right, or that I'm confused. I thought that they were working in b12,
but I already upgraded to b13, so I will have to reinstall to confirm
that.
Examples:
------------------------------------------------
Gambit Version 4.0 beta 13
> (load "srfis")
"/home/ben/srfis/srfis.o1"
> (char-set-size 'foo)
Process scheme segmentation fault
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
Gambit Version 4.0 beta 13
> (load "srfis")
"/home/ben/srfis/srfis.o1"
> (string-null? 4)
Process scheme segmentation fault
------------------------------------------------
I thought we were adding checks to avoid segfaults and such.
Ben
More information about the Gambit-list
mailing list