[gambit-list] Does , l do anything different than , s in the debugger?

Bradley Lucier lucier at math.purdue.edu
Wed Mar 23 11:39:27 EST 2005


I think Maxin Naumov found another bug.  Man, these students that take 
the documentation seriously ;-)!

I tried a straightforward definition of (fact n) and tried to leap 
through the subcall (fact (- n 1)) and it didn't work; in fact, ,l 
seemed to do the same thing as ,s in all cases.  Looks like a bug.

Brad




More information about the Gambit-list mailing list