[gambit-list] Does "time" report an accurate count of the	number of bytes allocated?
    Bradley Lucier 
    lucier at math.purdue.edu
       
    Fri Dec 21 09:31:25 EST 2012
    
    
  
On Dec 21, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Marc Feeley wrote:
<lots of helpful stuff>
Thanks.  What about this more vague question:
>> More generally, can the number of bytes reported be confused by stack manipulation?  I.e., if things go on the stack, but then the stack is unwound, does "time" report any allocation?
I'm writing some code that does not allocate anything, as far as I can tell from the GVM code, yet there is a report of 240 bytes allocated.  Am I missing something?
Brad
    
    
More information about the Gambit-list
mailing list