[gambit-list] Gambit internals documentation - draft of questions now on the wiki.
babu5677 at gmx.ch
Thu Aug 30 18:45:48 EDT 2012
first: Good work and great idea! I am looking forward to read the answers to the listed questions. Seems like a great opportunity to learn a lot.
Missing points: Perhaps adding some question on the readtable implementation and six-syntax would be nice. This also includes how serialization works and how lexical forms (e.g. when write or pretty-print is applied to a data-structure) are generated (the ##wr stuff).
But I am pretty new to gambit and just wanted to use the opportunity to say a big THANK YOU to Marc for this great and inspiring piece of software and everybody like Mikael who pushes documentation forward.
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:47:32 -0500
> Von: Mikael <mikael.rcv at gmail.com>
> An: gambit-list at iro.umontreal.ca, Marc Feeley <feeley at iro.umontreal.ca>
> Betreff: [gambit-list] Gambit internals documentation - draft of questions now on the wiki.
> Hi guys!
> Short summary: Please check section 4 and on on
> http://dynamo.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/wiki/index.php/Design_guide, and
> please give feedback the next 10 days!
> Long version:
> Please find here
> http://dynamo.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/wiki/index.php/Design_guide a draft
> of the Gambit documentation document spoken about in May.
> The purpose with the document is to communicate to the reader how Gambit
> works internally in the core areas (compilation, the stack with
> continuations, memory and object handling, threads, and so on).
> The document is a system of questions, whose answers from Marc will
> communicate this entire picture.
> Until now there has been no such documentation, and I believe this
> provides a suitable format to give the whole picture in an efficient way.
> It's really important that there is documentation of Gambit's internals,
> enable people to understand for themselves different aspects of Gambit's
> architecture, and make deep debugging and extensions.
> I hope and believe the document will prove valuable due to the profound
> conceptual level detail it is at. It's profound enough to provide
> sufficient information for those those who want to dig into and do hard
> work with Gambit's internals, yet conceptual and brief enough for the user
> to read the document in its entirety and get how all of Gambit fits
> together, with lots of associated aha experiences.
> I do believe that Marc's answers will give rise to some more questions in
> response, that will extend the document further a bit when they come.
> If you have any feedback - suggestions for more questions, clarifications,
> or perhaps removals, then please tell them here during the next ten days!
> Best regards,
More information about the Gambit-list