[gambit-list] Test 5 failed
Bradley Lucier
lucier at math.purdue.edu
Thu Oct 20 15:39:55 EDT 2011
On Oct 20, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Marc Feeley wrote:
> My point is that the compilation of Scheme to C by gsc should not expose machine dependencies. When the user writes +nan.0 in the Scheme code and compiles it to C, the C code should use the same IEEE NaN bit pattern regardless of the platform used to compile the Scheme program. That way the C code will be completely portable.
Perhaps +nan.0 (and perhaps other system-dependent constants) should always be computed at load time for the module.
More information about the Gambit-list
mailing list