[gambit-list] Help With Memory

Marc Feeley feeley at iro.umontreal.ca
Thu Sep 25 19:01:17 EDT 2008

Gambit does not use Cheney on the MTA, mainly because it interferes  
with the implementation of unrestricted calls from Scheme to C and  
from C to Scheme.  Gambit's implementation of continuations is done  
with a lazy copy of the captured continuation.  The performance is  
quite good... on the two call/cc intensive Gambit benchmarks (ctak and  
fibc) Gambit outperforms Chicken.  Note also that Gambit's thread  
system is based on continuations, so it is important for continuation  
operations to be efficient.


On 24-Sep-08, at 11:14 AM, Per Eckerdal wrote:

>> Chicken.  Cheney on the MTA gives you call/cc essentially
>> for free - it's just as fast as any other function call.
> I was under the impression that Gambit also did this.. Am I wrong?
> /Per
> _______________________________________________
> Gambit-list mailing list
> Gambit-list at iro.umontreal.ca
> https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list

More information about the Gambit-list mailing list