[gambit-list] DrScheme and GambitC
William Cook
wcook at cs.utexas.edu
Tue Sep 2 08:46:22 EDT 2008
The page you gave about quack didn't mention debugging,
and gambit.el has very minimal support, as far as I can tell.
My point is that these are not acceptable solutions,
yet the fact that people think they count as a solution seems
to prevent the creation of real solutions.
Telling me that "I can create my own" is also not very
helpful. I think that a language implementation is not
complete without a good out-of-the-box development
environment, which includes a good debugger. I stand by
my assertion that there are no complete implementations of
Scheme. And this is very unfortunate. I also admit being
annoyed by this situation, but I'm not just complaining;
I am trying to do something about it.
William
Alex Sandro Queiroz e Silva wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> William Cook wrote:
>> Yes, as i said in my email, I know that Emacs can do anything.
>>
>> If fancy means taking advantage of ubiquitous bit-mapped displays,
>> then I guess I do mean fancy.
>>
>
> So we can agree that Emacs is fancy too.
>
>> Neither of your links mention Scheme, as far as I can tell.
>> And searching for Schema and GDB didn't bring up much of
>> use either. Is there a connection between Emacs debugging
>> and Gambit Scheme? If so, I'd like to know about it, because
>> some of my students would like to use it.
>>
>
> Those are screenshots of the GDB mode, which I think is pretty
> neat. For Scheme one can use gambit.el (that comes with Gambit-C) or
> quack.el[1]. They may be not as fancy or beautiful as the GDB mode (or
> Eclipse), buy they do work. Besides, one can add as much fanciness as he
> wants.
>
> [1] - http://www.neilvandyke.org/quack/
>
> Cheers,
> -alex
> http://www.ventonegro.org/
>
--
William Cook
Assistant Professor
UT Austin Computer Sciences
More information about the Gambit-list
mailing list