[gambit-list] Suggesting silently released mutexes
Christian Jaeger
christian at pflanze.mine.nu
Sat May 24 05:47:00 EDT 2008
Christian Jaeger wrote:
> (All that can happen is that a C call frame will remain on the C
> stack if the termination happens to be during the callback, which is
> just a (rare) leak which is unavoidable anyway.)
>
Hm, after thinking (sleeping) over it, maybe this isn't true after all,
and hence the whole silently-released mutexes idea futile (and actually
dangerous); in any case this remains to be verified; I'll confirm the
usefulness/futility when done.
Christian.
More information about the Gambit-list
mailing list