[gambit-list] Thinking of changing pp

Marc Feeley feeley at iro.umontreal.ca
Sun Jun 1 15:28:42 EDT 2008

Invoking the module system to gain access to pp (or its replacement)  
would be too heavy for debugging purposes.  When I'm hunting a bug I  
want to add calls to pp with minimal effort.  My message was all about  
changing pp to reduce the overhead further.


On 1-Jun-08, at 12:31 PM, Jeff Read wrote:

> This is probably flamebait, but... A solution to the symbol-shortage
> problem would be a module system :) which supported encapsulation and
> export of both variables and syntax forms. :)
> --Jeff

More information about the Gambit-list mailing list