[gambit-list] Thinking of changing pp
Marc Feeley
feeley at iro.umontreal.ca
Sun Jun 1 15:28:42 EDT 2008
Invoking the module system to gain access to pp (or its replacement)
would be too heavy for debugging purposes. When I'm hunting a bug I
want to add calls to pp with minimal effort. My message was all about
changing pp to reduce the overhead further.
Marc
On 1-Jun-08, at 12:31 PM, Jeff Read wrote:
> This is probably flamebait, but... A solution to the symbol-shortage
> problem would be a module system :) which supported encapsulation and
> export of both variables and syntax forms. :)
>
> --Jeff
More information about the Gambit-list
mailing list