[gambit-list] Mercurial
Andrew Lentvorski
bsder at allcaps.org
Fri May 25 14:58:41 EDT 2007
Christian Jaeger wrote:
> Marc Feeley wrote:
>> On 25-May-07, at 8:52 AM, Aycan iRiCAN wrote:
>>
>>> .. It's distributed, interactive and supports
>>> spontaneous
>>> branches.
>
> Same thing for Git and probably for Mercurial, right?
In my opinion, yes.
> (Maybe Python is a better language than Shell/C. But I'm personally not
> really interested in writing Python.)
I'm personally not interested in hacking the code for my source control
system at all. :)
> A nice thing of Git (and perhaps also Mercurial) is it's conceptual
> simplicity.
I don't find the concepts between the two very different. Good ideas
and features from one seem to flow to the other fairly quickly.
The primary feature that I point to about Mercurial is: Windows.
Mercurial regards Windows as a necessary port. Git regards Windows as
an evil they tolerate.
-a
More information about the Gambit-list
mailing list