[gambit-list] Segfault while running Gambit; values/receive efficiency

Marc Feeley feeley at iro.umontreal.ca
Sun Aug 19 21:42:43 EDT 2007


On 19-Aug-07, at 9:16 PM, andrew cooke wrote:

> [...]
>> efficiency as (vector 1 2 3).  You'll get much better optimization by
>> using a CPS-style.  This is easy in your case: just pass in the
>> consumer of your values as a parameter, i.e. replace
>
> doing this and switching to vectors saved over 40% time, thanks.

Removing the vectors should save you quite a bit more...

Marc




More information about the Gambit-list mailing list