ben at fuhok.net
ben at fuhok.net
Mon Apr 11 23:51:46 EDT 2005
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 11:23:31PM -0500, Bradley Lucier wrote:
> I've included below the diffs between the implementation I sent before
> and this one; I hope I caught all the things you pointed out.
Add this one:
--- srfis.bak/string-lib.scm 2005-04-09 23:01:45.000000000 -0500
+++ srfis/string-lib.scm 2005-04-11 22:29:21.713553376 -0500
@@ -829,7 +829,7 @@
(macro-check-string-start-end s start end (string-count s criterion start end)
(##string-count s criterion start end)))
-(define (##string-count criterion s start end)
+(define (##string-count s criterion start end)
(cond ((char? criterion)
(do ((i start (+ i 1))
(count 0 (if (char=? criterion (string-ref s i))
Right now, string-count is still broken (unless I've got my diffs mixed up).
> I've included a tar file with all the .scm files again. Put them in a
> directory srfis at the same level as lib/gsi/gsc in the gambit
> directory and compile with
> [zakon2-iro-umontreal-ca:~/programs/gambc40b12/srfis] bjlucier% gsc
> Gambit Version 4.0 beta 12
> > (compile-file "srfis" '(check))
> > (load "srfis")
That seems to work well. However, as the srfi collection grows, I
would think that compiling them into separate loadable libraries would
be better, instead of lumping them into one big srfis.o. Perhaps
srfi-55 could be implemented.
> At any rate, perhaps we can use this strategy: Assume that we're
> compiling all SRFIs in a directory srfis in the Gambit directory as I
> suggested, and work at incrementally improving this code rather than
> starting with a new one.
Sounds good. I think we are missing a few functions. I will likely
send you another patch in a few days to correct that.
More information about the Gambit-list