On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Adrien Pierard <pierarda@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 07:24:12PM -0600, Matthew Martin wrote :
>> I'm not sure how picky license: is. Would (license: bsd/mit-like) be ok?>Or perhaps a link to a file inside the snowball, where this full header
>> Something more descriptive?
>is, plus whatever compatible license you want to couple it with.
>> And a suggestion:
>>
>> It'd be nice if the docs mentioned that if you're using a *BSD, you probably
>> want to use gtar when creating snowballs.
>> I was racking my brain for a while on that one. Using NetBSD's default tar
>> at least, seems to confuse snowman when it
>> tries to unpack the snowball saying something about invalid filenames.
>All my computers run FreeBSD, and I never had any issue with snow and
>tar.
>One solution could be a snow package that builds others, with a simple
>tar embedded.
>Adrien
>--
>"I am not a Church numeral; I am a free variable!"
>(The Scheme Underground)
>For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
>_______________________________________________
>Snow-users-list mailing list
>Snow-users-list@iro.umontreal.ca
>https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/snow-users-list