Hi all, the macro approach is giving about x2 speed even if not all bitwise operation are using it. Still I am using bignums to pass around bit boards in my code.
compiled binary with regular bitwise operation
> position fen r3k2r/p1ppqpb1/bn2pnp1/3PN3/1p2P3/2N2Q1p/PPPBBPPP/R3K2R w KQkq - 0 1
> perft depth 4
> info string depth= 4 nodes= 4085603 time= 9604. nps= 425406
compiled binary with the macro approach
> position fen r3k2r/p1ppqpb1/bn2pnp1/3PN3/1p2P3/2N2Q1p/PPPBBPPP/R3K2R w KQkq - 0 1
> perft depth 4
> info string depth= 4 nodes= 4085603 time= 5795. nps= 705022
I had to fix lots of bottlenecks in my code to see the nice boost this low level code can give.
Thanks!
Paolo
MarcOn Apr 26, 2020, at 9:48 AM, Paolo <pmontrasi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Brad, thank you for your suggestion.
I ended up in testing something similar to the following example
(define (u64-xor . args-list)
(##bignum.normalize!
(fold
(lambda (x big)
(let ((x-big (if (fixnum? x) (##fixnum->bignum x) x)))
(##bignum.adigit-bitwise-xor! big 0 x-big 0)
big))
(##bignum.make 2 ##bignum.adigit-zeros #f)
args-list)))
it worked but with no noticeable improvements and this fact helped me in looking elsewhere to find speed problems … I found a lot of them in my code of course ;-)
Well I tried to do my best to fix most of the performance issues and I am now pretty happy with what I have come to, therefore I point you to my code in case you are looking for a fun "chess scheme" challenge.
https://github.com/pmon/coronachess
Thank you for your help, my best
Paolo
Nice! I’ll have to try it out… As you noticed the name Gambit has its origins in chess… I used to play regularly. A gambit is a kind of scheme… and it is a calculated risk (which felt quite appropriate for my PhD work which was also risky).To do high speed calculations on raw 64 bit integers, I would tend to use u64vectors (or even u8vectors) to store the 64 bit integers and to drop down to C when some operation on these integers must be done without creating bignums. Something along these lines:(declare (standard-bindings) (extended-bindings) (not safe))(c-declare "#define ELEM0(u64vect) ___BODY_AS(u64vect,___tSUBTYPED)[0]")(define-macro (u64-xor! v1 v2) ;; v1[0] = v1[0] ^ v2[0] `(##c-code "ELEM0(___ARG1) ^= ELEM0(___ARG2);" v1 v2))(define v1 (u64vector #x0123456789ABCDEF))(define v2 (u64vector #x00FF00FF00FF00FF))(println (number->string (u64vector-ref v1 0) 16))(println (number->string (u64vector-ref v2 0) 16))(u64-xor! v1 v2)(println (number->string (u64vector-ref v1 0) 16))You could create a small library of such macros for the various 64 bit operations, and try to avoid as much as possible conversions to and from bignums which probably incurs a high overhead in your application.Marc