Remember
that for c-define-type :s that do not have a release
procedure specified, there is *no* deallocation (such as
free() etc.) invoked at their scheme-world GC.
I've read in the documentation for the default release function
(pointer ..) and (nonnull-pointer ...) types are not performing any
deallocation like you mentioned.
I'm a little bit curious about (struct ..) type-definitions because
due to the documentation it has probably a more useful default
behaviour for releasing.
Can i assume if i allocate and use a (struct ...) type that the GC
management system will handle this reference properly? (in contrast
to pointers)
This would save me a lot of specific cleanup code for all predefined
types if gambit's system is performing delete calls automatically
for structs.