Thanks Per,

I had followed by the Mikael's recommendation to use Sack instead.
My question is: How stable and complete the Sack is?

-
best wishes
Val

On Aug 2, 2010, at 1:49 AM, Per Eckerdal wrote:


Hmm.. I don't remember seeing the problem that you're mentioning. Two things:

Are you using the code from http://github.com/pereckerdal/sack ? That's the "up-to-date" version, although it really isn't very well maintained either.

The telnet example that you give doesn't provide any insight, because you don't provide a valid HTTP request. The server assumes that the client is a pre-HTTP 1.0 client and provides a response without headers. So the response that you see from telnet isn't what the browsers get. You could try

GET /one HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost

instead, which is the minimal valid HTTP request in this case.



best,
Per