2016-07-16 19:52 GMT+08:00 Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca>:

I agree with Brad. Let’s not blow this out of proportion.

Right, yes.

I don’t foresee very deep work on new patches. It is mostly picking patches from those done since that version so there has already been a decent level of scrutiny.

Good point.

Also we could have “lts” and “lts-candidate” branches so the patches can go to lts-candidate first and if the interested parties (to be determined) give their ok then the patch is applied to lts too.

I guess noone will ever be in disagreement about commits that are kept in there, so there's not any need even for that.

Anyone who uses HEAD needs to review any commits new to him obviously.

So the next step is.. action?