Oh, part of the reason why I'm interested in it is because I'd love to see documentation available in the REPL.  I know about the help browser = lynx thing, but I think it would be cleaner if documentation was associated with the functions in the REPL.

-Jason


On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Jason Felice <jason.m.felice@gmail.com> wrote:
If there was a way to scrape documentation from source comments, I would love to send pull requests to make that happen.  Any work I did would be in small batches that would arrive at random intervals.

-Jason


On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:

On Jun 20, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Guillaume Cartier <gcartier@jazzscheme.org> wrote:

> There is also the 6.4 Undocumented extensions section in the Gambit manual that is there for this purpose, correct me if I'm wrong Marc.

In principle that section if for documenting the existence of procedures that don't have documentation.  I see that the first few are documented and should be moved elsewhere!  The documentation should be cleaned up.  Are there people out there with some free time and a generous nature?

Marc

_______________________________________________
Gambit-list mailing list
Gambit-list@iro.umontreal.ca
https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list