Aha.Brief Q:s:1) The force code is not blocking the thread scheduler, right - so the lazy expression can do (thread-sleep! alot) without freezing the host, right?2) The auto-forcing is universal, right?3) Any guess about how much slower the generated code becomes, do you think it's rather 20% or 400%?I guess if on the C/assembly level the check is really simple, then a good CPU will be able to optimize through already-forced values via branch prediction so rather 20% .. ?2016-06-10 10:40 GMT+08:00 Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca>:When using --enable-auto-force, it is OK for test1 to fail this way (because test1 introspects the structure of the generated code, and, unfortunately, using auto forcing changes the structure of the code).
Marc
> On Jun 9, 2016, at 4:00 PM, Bradley Lucier <lucier@math.purdue.edu> wrote:
>
> I'm taking the liberty of adding the Gambit mail list to the CC, since this may be of general interest.
>
> "make check" fails after configuring with
>
> ./configure 'CC=/usr/local/gcc-6.1.0/bin/gcc -march=native' '--enable-single-host' '--enable-multiple-versions' '--enable-shared' --enable-auto-forcing
>
> "make -i check" (to ignore errors and continue) gives
>
> ------------ TEST 1 (debugging support)
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../lib:../gsi:../gsc:/usr/local/Gambit/current/lib:/usr/local/netpbm10/lib:/usr/local/gcc-6.1.0/lib/: ../gsi/gsi -:~~bin=../bin,~~lib=../lib,~~include=../include -f debug.scm > test1.out
> diff test1.ok test1.out && rm -f test1.out
> 81a82
>> #return(##cprc-if2 3) : ($code rte)
> 85a87
>> #return(##cprc-if3 3) : ($code rte)
> 108a111
>> #return(##cprc-cond-if 3) : ($code rte)
> 112a116
>> #return(##cprc-cond-or 3) : ($code rte)
> 117,120c121,126
> < #return(##cprc-cond-send-red 3) : ($code rte pred)
> < #procedure(##cprc-cond-send-red 4)
> < #return(##cprc-cond-send-red 5) : ($code rte oper)
> < #return(##cprc-cond-send-red 6) : ($code rte)
> ---
>> #return(##cprc-cond-send-red 3) : ($code rte)
>> #return(##cprc-cond-send-red 4) : ($code rte pred)
>> #return(##cprc-cond-send-red 5) : ($code rte pred)
>> #procedure(##cprc-cond-send-red 6)
>> #return(##cprc-cond-send-red 7) : ($code rte oper)
>> #return(##cprc-cond-send-red 8) : ($code rte)
> 125,127c131,135
> < #return(##cprc-cond-send-sub 3) : ($code rte pred)
> < #return(##cprc-cond-send-sub 4) : ($code rte oper)
> < #return(##cprc-cond-send-sub 5) : ($code rte)
> ---
>> #return(##cprc-cond-send-sub 3) : ($code rte)
>> #return(##cprc-cond-send-sub 4) : ($code rte pred)
>> #return(##cprc-cond-send-sub 5) : ($code rte pred)
>> #return(##cprc-cond-send-sub 6) : ($code rte oper)
>> #return(##cprc-cond-send-sub 7) : ($code rte)
> 131a140
>> #return(##cprc-or 3) : ($code rte)
> 135a145
>> #return(##cprc-and 3) : ($code rte)
> 140c150,151
> < #return(##cprc-case 3) : (rte $code)
> ---
>> #return(##cprc-case 3) : ($code rte)
>> #return(##cprc-case 4) : (rte $code)
> 250,251c261,263
> < #procedure(##cprc-app0-red 3)
> < #return(##cprc-app0-red 4) : ($code rte)
> ---
>> #return(##cprc-app0-red 3) : ($code rte)
>> #procedure(##cprc-app0-red 4)
>> #return(##cprc-app0-red 5) : ($code rte)
> 257,259c269,272
> < #procedure(##cprc-app1-red 4)
> < #return(##cprc-app1-red 5) : ($code rte oper)
> < #return(##cprc-app1-red 6) : ($code rte)
> ---
>> #return(##cprc-app1-red 4) : ($code rte oper)
>> #procedure(##cprc-app1-red 5)
>> #return(##cprc-app1-red 6) : ($code rte oper)
>> #return(##cprc-app1-red 7) : ($code rte)
> 266,268c279,282
> < #procedure(##cprc-app2-red 5)
> < #return(##cprc-app2-red 6) : ($code rte oper)
> < #return(##cprc-app2-red 7) : ($code rte)
> ---
>> #return(##cprc-app2-red 5) : ($code rte oper arg1)
>> #procedure(##cprc-app2-red 6)
>> #return(##cprc-app2-red 7) : ($code rte oper)
>> #return(##cprc-app2-red 8) : ($code rte)
> 276,278c290,293
> < #procedure(##cprc-app3-red 6)
> < #return(##cprc-app3-red 7) : ($code rte oper)
> < #return(##cprc-app3-red 8) : ($code rte)
> ---
>> #return(##cprc-app3-red 6) : ($code rte oper arg1 arg2)
>> #procedure(##cprc-app3-red 7)
>> #return(##cprc-app3-red 8) : ($code rte oper)
>> #return(##cprc-app3-red 9) : ($code rte)
> 287,289c302,305
> < #procedure(##cprc-app4-red 7)
> < #return(##cprc-app4-red 8) : ($code rte oper)
> < #return(##cprc-app4-red 9) : ($code rte)
> ---
>> #return(##cprc-app4-red 7) : ($code rte oper arg1 arg2 arg3)
>> #procedure(##cprc-app4-red 8)
>> #return(##cprc-app4-red 9) : ($code rte oper)
>> #return(##cprc-app4-red 10) : ($code rte)
> 297,298c313,315
> < #procedure(##cprc-app-red 6)
> < #return(##cprc-app-red 7) : ($code rte)
> ---
>> #return(##cprc-app-red 6) : ($code rte oper)
>> #procedure(##cprc-app-red 7)
>> #return(##cprc-app-red 8) : ($code rte)
> 303a321
>> #return(##cprc-app0-sub 4) : ($code rte)
> 310c328,329
> < #return(##cprc-app1-sub 5) : ($code rte)
> ---
>> #return(##cprc-app1-sub 5) : ($code rte oper)
>> #return(##cprc-app1-sub 6) : ($code rte)
> 317,318c336,338
> < #return(##cprc-app2-sub 5) : ($code rte oper)
> < #return(##cprc-app2-sub 6) : ($code rte)
> ---
>> #return(##cprc-app2-sub 5) : ($code rte oper arg1)
>> #return(##cprc-app2-sub 6) : ($code rte oper)
>> #return(##cprc-app2-sub 7) : ($code rte)
> 326,327c346,348
> < #return(##cprc-app3-sub 6) : ($code rte oper)
> < #return(##cprc-app3-sub 7) : ($code rte)
> ---
>> #return(##cprc-app3-sub 6) : ($code rte oper arg1 arg2)
>> #return(##cprc-app3-sub 7) : ($code rte oper)
>> #return(##cprc-app3-sub 8) : ($code rte)
> 336,337c357,359
> < #return(##cprc-app4-sub 7) : ($code rte oper)
> < #return(##cprc-app4-sub 8) : ($code rte)
> ---
>> #return(##cprc-app4-sub 7) : ($code rte oper arg1 arg2 arg3)
>> #return(##cprc-app4-sub 8) : ($code rte oper)
>> #return(##cprc-app4-sub 9) : ($code rte)
> 345,346c367,369
> < #procedure(##cprc-app-sub 6)
> < #return(##cprc-app-sub 7) : ($code rte)
> ---
>> #return(##cprc-app-sub 6) : ($code rte oper)
>> #procedure(##cprc-app-sub 7)
>> #return(##cprc-app-sub 8) : ($code rte)
> makefile:113: recipe for target 'test1' failed
> make[1]: [test1] Error 1 (ignored)
>
>
> I don't know whether this is important.
>
> Brad
>
> On 06/09/2016 02:11 PM, Mikael More wrote:
>> Awesomeness, thanks!!!!!
>>
>> Fantastic, this means tight integration with a functional object
>> database is possible.
>>
>> I guess the expression code is running under the scheduler too, opening
>> for storage of the database on non-low-latency facilities too, great!
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-06-10 1:30 GMT+08:00 Bradley Lucier <lucier@math.purdue.edu
>> <mailto:lucier@math.purdue.edu>>:
>>
>> Try adding --enable-auto-forcing to your configure of Gambit.
>>
>>
>> On 06/09/2016 01:20 PM, Adam wrote:
>>
>> Hi Marc!
>>
>> I have a practical question:
>>
>> I am thinking about the possibility of realizing a TIGHTLY
>> integrated
>> persistent object store ("object database").
>>
>> (Tightly integrated, that is, with the Scheme heap.)
>>
>> The object store would be functional, so the host system can cache
>> object references as much as it wants.
>>
>>
>> My question is:
>>
>> The best thing would be to
>>
>> 1) Have lazy loading of objects into the Scheme heap from the
>> database
>> (because the stored structures may have wather depth and shape
>> meaning
>> that precaching algorithms never would have an idea about what
>> really
>> needs to be loaded, so better let the code show that simply
>> through what
>> slots etc. it accesses), *AND* to at the same time
>>
>> 2) *NOT* need to customize the Scheme code for the lazy loading,
>> i.e.,
>> have implicit |force| all over the code?
>>
>>
>> A final wish here would be
>>
>> 3) The option that the |force| would be run as a procedure
>> within the
>> green threading system, so that other green threads would continue
>> executing while the lazy value is being loaded. Not sure about
>> this one
>> though - maybe for code-performance reasons it would be better
>> to have
>> it block.
>>
>>
>> Even runtime procedures would need to do the implicit |force|.
>> So the
>> values that not are loaded right now, would be represented by a
>> loading
>> closure, and the result of closure invocation would be the value
>> that
>> should take the place of the respective accessed slot.
>>
>>
>> Can this be done in Gambit, in its current form or with some
>> very slight
>> modification?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>